Juridical Analysis Of The Use Of Dna Forensic Evidence In The Indonesian Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v3i11.3278Keywords:
Forensic Evidence;, Criminal Law;, RegulationAbstract
The use of forensic DNA evidence in the criminal justice system in Indonesia faces various challenges, especially related to regulations that are not fully aligned with international standards. Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), especially Articles 184 and 186, does not provide specific guidelines regarding the procedures for collecting, testing, and using forensic DNA evidence in the criminal evidence process. This study aims to analyze the regulations and procedures governing forensic DNA evidence in Indonesia and propose legal solutions to strengthen the regulations to comply with international standards. This study uses a normative legal research method, focusing on the analysis of relevant laws, legal doctrines, and court decisions. Discussions center on the harmonization of national regulations with international standards, strengthening the capacity of forensic institutions, and reforming legal procedures related to DNA evidence. The research findings indicate that Indonesia needs more comprehensive regulatory reforms related to the use of forensic DNA evidence, especially regarding the accreditation of forensic laboratories according to international standards such as ISO 17025 and the development of transparent and legally accountable evidence collection procedures. In conclusion, although DNA evidence has great potential to strengthen convictions in the criminal justice system, regulatory reform and strengthening of forensic institutions are needed for the Indonesian justice system to adopt higher international standards. Thus, the use of forensic DNA evidence can contribute significantly to justice in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia.
References
Hadi, A., Faridah, DN, Erawan, D., Sutriah, K., & Budiantri, F. (2018). Implementation of Sni Iso/Iec 17025: 2017 General Requirements for Competence of Testing Laboratories and Calibration Laboratories. National Standardization Agency.
Medwed , DS (2017). False Beliefs and the DNA Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Motian, YN, & Pura, MH (2024). Strength of Forensic Expert Testimony in Murder Cases Based on Article 184 of Law Number 08 of 1981 Concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 320 K/Pid/2017). Inovatif: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(4), 9048–9057. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Innovative.V4i4.13624
Nikhio , A., Sekarwati Amalia, C., & Irawan, Z. (2023). Indigenous Knowledge Law Enforcement in Indonesia: The Role of Government in Realizing It . 2.
Prakasa, ZB (2020). Transformation of Scientific Evidence into Evidence in Environmental Pollution or Destruction Cases. Islamic University of Indonesia.
Ratna Pertiwi, K. (2015). Application of DNA Technology in Forensic Identification. Wuny Scientific Journal, 16(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Jwuny.V16i4.3518.
Ratnawati, L., & Ruslie, AS (2023). Regulation of the Use of Forensic Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid (DNA) Tests as Criminal Evidence. Journal of Law and Citizenship, 1(1).
Rianti, P., Cristin, E., & Widodo, PT (2020). Forensic DNA Profile on Evidence of Two Murder Cases in Indonesia. Journal of Biodiversity Resources, 4(2), 48- 56. Https://Doi.Org/10.29244/Jsdh.4.2.48-56
Saks, M.J., & Faigmain, D.L. (2008). Evidence-Based Litigation Reform: Enhancing the Forensic Science Foundation of Criminal Justice. . Virginia Law Review, 94(2), 283–310.
Sandwinata , Muh. F. (2019). Analysis DNA in Forensic Cases . Teknosains : Science and Technology Information Media , 12(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Teknosains.V12i1.7863
Silaban, BAM (2023). The Role of Laboratory Forensics In Evidence Revealing Action Crimes Committed Use Firearms (Vol. 9) [ Hkbp Nommensen University]. Https://Doi.Org/10.51622/Patik.V9i3.242
Silaban , MBS, Idham , I., & Erniyanti , E. (2023). Analysis Juridical Investigation Process Action Criminal Violence Sexual According to Law in Indonesia: Analysis of Positive Legal Theory and Responsive Legal Theory. Scientific Study of Law and State, 1(2), 71- 77. Https://Doi.Org/10.35912/Kihan.V1i2.1912
Simanjuntak, ELN (2012). The Probative Power of DNA Tests as Evidence in Criminal Justice Processes in Indonesia. Brawijaya University.
Syahrum, M. (2022). Methodology Observer Research Huikuim : Kaijiain Research Normative, Empirical, Writing Proposal, Report Dain Thesis Thesis. Cv. Dotpluis Publisher.
Tan, D. (2021). Legal Research Methods: Examining and Reviewing Methodology in Conducting Legal Research. Nusantara: Journal of Social Sciences, 8(8), 2463–2478.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suryo Wijoyo, Suparno Suparno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
