Studi Komparasi Payback Framework Dan Grc Sebagai Kerangka Kerja Evaluasi Program
Downloads
This study compares the Payback Framework and the Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) framework as evaluation tools for research funding programs. The Payback Framework, developed in 1994 by Buxton and Hanney, focuses on assessing the impact of health research, encompassing knowledge creation, policy influence, and economic benefits. On the other hand, the GRC framework emphasizes risk management, governance, and regulatory compliance, ensuring that programs are managed effectively within regulatory boundaries. This comparative analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of both frameworks, examining their applicability to different types of programs. The Payback Framework is well-suited for research programs that require long-term impact assessment, particularly in healthcare and social sciences. Meanwhile, the GRC framework is more appropriate for sectors with stringent compliance requirements, such as finance and healthcare. This study provides insights into the choice of evaluation frameworks based on program objectives, organizational needs, and available resources..
Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). “Evaluation of Preschool Education Program According to CIPP Model”. Pedagogical Research, 6(2), em0091. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701
Donovan C. & Hanney S. (2011). “The ‘Payback Framework’ Explained”, Research Evaluation, Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 181–183, https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635756
Mertens, D.M. (2023). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=fkbkEAAAQBAJ
Norimarna, S. (2021). “Conceptual Review: Compatibility of regulatory requirements of FSA to Insurance industry in Indonesia for Integrated GRC”. RSF Conference Series: Business, Management and Social Sciences, 1(5), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v1i5.456
Siahaan, M., Suharman, H., Fitrijanti, T. and Umar, H. (2023). “Will the integrated GRC implementation be effective against corruption?”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2021-0275
Supriyadi H., Proyarsono D.S., Achsani N.A., Andati T. (2024). “An Integrated GRC Approach to Combating Fraud in Microloan Services”. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, Vol.7 No.4., 1580-1581. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i4.3457
Copyright (c) 2025 Filda Nurria Agustifa, Haryo Dwito Armono, Tatang A. Taufik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
