Studi Numerik Perbandingan Peletakan Buckling-Restrained Braces Terhadap Perilaku Dinamik Gempa Pada Struktur Beton Bertulang

Authors

  • Mario Andro Hipay Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i4.5368

Keywords:

BRB, beton bertulang, analisis riwayat waktu, interstory drift ratio, disipasi energi

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh variasi penempatan Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB) terhadap kinerja seismik struktur beton bertulang 8 lantai menggunakan analisis riwayat waktu (time history analysis) pada perangkat lunak SeismoStruct. Tiga variasi penempatan BRB dievaluasi, yaitu Mid Bay, Perimeter, Hybrid dan satu model Baseline (tanpa bracing). Parameter yang ditinjau meliputi interstory drift ratio (IDR), kapasitas disipasi energi, dan Residual drift. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa struktur tanpa bracing mengalami IDR maksimum sebesar 3,175%, melebihi ambang batas 2% menurut ASCE 7-16. Variasi Mid Bay menurunkan IDR maksimum menjadi 1,487%, sedangkan variasi Perimeter mencapai 1,692%. Variasi Hybrid menghasilkan IDR maksimum terendah sebesar 1,056% dengan distribusi simpangan antar lantai yang paling merata. Dari sisi disipasi energi, variasi Hybrid mencapai kapasitas tertinggi sebesar 12.212,40 kN·m, dibandingkan Mid Bay (7.932,07 kN·m) dan Perimeter (6.561,18 kN·m). Residual drift juga terkecil pada variasi Hybrid (<0,15% di seluruh lantai). Secara keseluruhan, strategi penempatan Hybrid terbukti paling efektif dalam meningkatkan kinerja seismik struktur, karena mampu menurunkan simpangan antar lantai, menyerap energi gempa paling besar, serta meminimalkan deformasi pasca gempa.

References

Ahmed, M., Tayyaba, S., & Ashraf, M. W. (2016). Effect of Buckling Restrained Braces Locations on Seismic Responses of High?Rise RC Core Wall Buildings. Shock and Vibration, 2016(1), 6808137.

American Institute of Steel Construction. (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-16). American Institute of Steel Construction.

Badoux, M., dan Jirsa, J. O. (1990). Steel bracing of RC frames for seismic retrofitting. Journal of Structural Engineering.

Bahrami, A. (2021). Study of eccentric and buckling-restrained bracing systems used in frames. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 6(4), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210604.13

Bohara, B. K., Ganaie, K. H., dan Saha, P. (2022). Effect of position of steel bracing in L-shape reinforced concrete buildings under lateral loading. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 8(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2021.295st0519

Bose, M., dan Ghosh, G. (2025). Effect of location and types of bracing on the seismic performance of an unsymmetrical building. Procedia Structural Integrity, 70, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.07.036

Cari, K. C., Tripriyo, D., dan Bramantoro, A. (2023). Pengaruh bentuk bracing eksentris pada struktur gedung baja terhadap kinerja struktur dengan analisis gempa respon spektrum. Composite: Journal of Civil Engineering, 2, 25–32.

Chadhar, S., dan Sharma, A. (2015). Seismic analysis of multistorey steel building with different types of bracing systems. International Journal of Engineering Research dan Technology (IJERT), 4(9), 1–6.

Chopra, A. K. (2012). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Faizi, S. A., Yoshitomi, S., dan Faizi, A. (2016). Optimal placement of Buckling-Restrained Braces in reinforced concrete building structures. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22702.82247

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450). Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Feng, Y., Wu, J., Wang, C., & Meng, S. (2016). Elastic displacement spectrum-based design approach for buckling-restrained braced frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 20(6), 841–860.

López, W. A., dan Sabelli, R. (2004). Seismic design of Buckling-Restrained Brace frames. Structural Steel Educational Council.

Mahoney, M., dan Hanson, R. D. (2018). Seismic performance assessment of buildings: Volume 1—Methodology (2nd ed.). Applied Technology Council.

McCormick, J., Aburano, H., Ikenaga, M., dan Nakashima, M. (2008). Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

Moehle, J. P. (2015). Seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings. McGraw-Hill Education.

Nandy, A. K., & Jog, C. S. (2014). Conservation properties of the trapezoidal rule in linear time domain analysis of acoustics and structures. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1401.0991

Razzaghi, S. A. S., dan Hatami, H. R. (2019). Evaluating the performance of Buckling-Restrained Braces in tall buildings with peripherally Brace frames. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 7(2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2018.12407.1213

Repadi, J. A., Sunaryati, J., dan Thamrin, R. (2016). Analisis kinerja struktur beton bertulang dengan variasi penempatan bracing inverted V. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 12(2), 1–10.

Sabelli, R., Mahin, S., dan Chang, C. (2003). Seismic demands on steel Brace frame buildings with Buckling-Restrained Braces. Engineering Structures, 25(5), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X

U.S. Geological Survey. (2025). U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. United States Geological Survey.

United States Geological Survey. (2022). Earthquake glossary. United States Geological Survey.

Zona, A., dan Dall’Asta, A. (2012). Elastoplastic model for steel Buckling-Restrained Braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 68(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.017

Downloads

Published

2026-04-06