The Effect of Toxic Leadership on Turnover Intention; Study on Mediation of Work Environment and Cognitive Distress at SMA Islam Samarinda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i2.5407Keywords:
Toxic Leadership, Turnover Intention, Work Environment, Cognitive DistressAbstract
Leadership behavior plays a crucial role in creating a healthy and sustainable work environment. However, the emergence of a destructive leadership style (toxic leadership) can cause psychological stress, discomfort, and even turnover intention among employees. This study aims to analyze the influence of toxic leadership on turnover intention among teachers and educational staff at Samarinda Islamic High School, as well as to examine the mediating role of the work environment and cognitive distress. This study employed a quantitative approach, collecting data through questionnaires. The analytical model used was Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Based on theoretical studies and previous research, toxic leadership is suspected to have a positive effect on turnover intention, both directly and indirectly, through a non-conducive work environment and cognitive distress experienced by employees. This study is expected to provide empirical contributions regarding the psychological and environmental factors influencing turnover intention in the education sector, as well as offer input for school administrators in developing healthy and supportive leadership patterns.
References
A, S. (2023). A systematic review of moderators. Work & Stress, 37(3), 345–372.
Arshad, A. (2022). Employees in the face of abusive supervision: Using personal, social and environment resources as coping mechanisms. The University of Waikato.
Biswakarma, G., Aithal, P. S., Singh, S. K., Gnawali, A., & Ghimire, J. (2024). Workplace bullying and employees’ turnover intention in hospitality industry: evidence of Nepal. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2317197.
Dwita, F. (2022). The Effect Of Toxic Leadership And Job Stress On Turnover Intention In Logistic Courier Bekasi City. Airlangga J. Innov. Manag, 3(2), 10.
Farley, S., Mokhtar, D., Ng, K., & Niven, K. (2023). What influences the relationship between workplace bullying and employee well-being?
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of management, 26(3), 463-488.
Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The leadership quarterly, 28(1), 178-194.
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of applied psychology, 102(3), 530.
Iqbal, J., Asghar, A., & Asghar, M. Z. (2022). Effect of despotic leadership on employee turnover intention: mediating toxic workplace environment and cognitive distraction in academic institutions. Behavioral sciences, 12(5), 125.
Kelloway, E. K., Sivanathan, N., Francis, L., & Barling, J. (2005). Poor leadership. In Handbook of work stress (pp. 89-112). SAGE Publications, Inc..
Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & stress, 31(2), 101-120.
Noviantoro, D., Septiana, S., & Sakarina, S. (2024). Understanding Toxic Leadership: The role of Job Stress and Job Satisfaction in Mediating Turnover Intention. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 4(02), 1352-1376.
Schmidt, A. A. (2008). Development and validation of the toxic leadership scale. University of Maryland, College Park.
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 24(1), 138-158.
Taris, T. W. (2022). What we need to know about workplace bullying. Work & Stress, 36(2), 129-132.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of management, 33(3), 261-289.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ariesta Heksarini, Dwie Meynina, Muhammad Samman, Ratna Purnamasari, Yunita Yunita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




