Toward Credible Capital Expenditure Estimation: Benchmarking to Risk-Based Integrated Cost and Schedule Estimation Approach

Main Article Content

Muhammad Fadhli Zilikram
Institut Teknologi Bandung
Gatot Yudoko
Institut Teknologi Bandung

Cost overruns and schedule delays are persistent challenges in Indonesia’s downstream oil and gas projects, largely resulting from inaccurate capital expenditure (CAPEX) estimates that undermine budget reliability and investment credibility. This research aims to enhance estimation accuracy by developing a Risk-Based Integrated Cost and Schedule Estimation Model designed to strengthen the credibility of CAPEX projections during the investment proposal phase. The study applies a mixed-method approach, combining benchmarking against four international best practices—Project Management Institute (PMI), Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and Government Accountability Office (GAO)—with qualitative validation through expert interviews and quantitative validation using Monte Carlo simulation on a test case project. The findings indicate that the existing estimation process achieves only 64% accuracy for cost and 52% for schedule performance compared to the proposed integrated model. Validation results demonstrate that the new model improves estimation accuracy within the AACE Class 3 range (–10% to –20% on the low side and +10% to +30% on the high side), with test case outcomes of +15% for cost variance and +0.6% for schedule variance. These results confirm the model’s effectiveness in enhancing project budget credibility and supporting more reliable investment decision-making. Overall, the Risk-Based Integrated Cost and Schedule Estimation Model provides a structured framework for integrating risk assessment with cost and schedule planning, facilitating the adoption of international best practices in Indonesia’s downstream oil and gas sector.


Keywords: CAPEX accuracy, integrated cost-schedule, risk-based estimating
AACE International. (2020). 18R-97: Cost Estimate Classification System – As Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for the Process Industries. AACE International.
AACE International. (2023). 123R-22 Integrated Cost And Schedule Risk Analysis And Contingency Determination Using Estimate Ranging And Expected Value With Monte Carlo Simulation.
Abdelalim, Ahmed Mohammed, Salem, Maram, Salem, Mohamed, Al-Adwani, Manal, & Tantawy, Mohamed. (2024). An analysis of factors contributing to cost overruns in the global construction industry. Buildings, 15(1), 18.
A.T. Kearney. (n.d.). Excellence in Capital Projects: A Goal Yet to Be Achieved. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://www.atkearney.com
Chiswa, Natasha. (2024). Unlocking Africa’s economic potential: The role of PPPs in fuelling infrastructure development and investment–South Africa’s perspective. Jindal Global Law Review, 15(1), 157–185.
Dominteanu, Teodora, Smîdu, Nelu?a, Voinea, Andreea, Dinciu, Corina Claudia, Porfireanu, Maria Cristiana, & Iacobini, Adrian. (2023). What are esports? Introduction to the global phenomenon of esports. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 1421–1430. Sciendo.
Gatti, Stefano. (2023). Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects. Elsevier.
Gómez-Cabrera, Adriana, Gutierrez-Bucheli, Laura, & Muñoz, Santiago. (2024). Causes of time and cost overruns in construction projects: a scoping review. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(10), 1107–1125.
Harake, M. F. (2025). Evaluating Project Scope in Unstable Environments: Adaptive Frameworks for Uncertainty and Change.
Hermawan, Dedi, Isvara, Wisnu, & Ichsan, Mohammad. (2024). Critical risk factors associated with schedule delays in gas processing facility projects: Case study in Indonesia. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 29(6), 60–73.
Hollmann, J. K. (2016). Project risk quantification: A practitioner’s guide to realistic cost and schedule risk management. Validation Estimating LLC.
Islam, Muhammad Saiful, Nepal, Madhav, & Skitmore, Martin. (2025). Structuring risks for a comprehensive understanding of cost overruns in power plant projects. Construction Innovation, 25(3), 1014–1032.
Mohamed, Habiba Mahdy. (2025). Study of Capital and Operation Costs for Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants. The American University in Cairo (Egypt).
Mumtaz, Farhad, Muhammad, Tahir, & Abid, Hafiz Muhammad Sarmad. (2025). Budget Overruns in Large-Scale Projects: Root Causes and Preventive Project Management Practice. Advance Journal of Econometrics and Finance, 3(3), 21–33.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2015). NASA cost estimating handbook (CEH). National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Project Management Institute. (2019). Practice Standard for Project Estimating. www.PMI.org
Sadeanu, M. (2017). ISO 21500:2012 vs Other Project Management Standards. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349054238
Savila, Santtu. (2025). Optimizing Invesment Project Cost Control.
Shah, V. A. (2021). Cost and Time Overrun in Various Construction Projects: A Review (Vol. 58, Issue 5). Article Accepted. www.psychologyandeducation.net
Sullivan, W. G., Wicks, E. M., & Koelling, C. P. (2017). Engineering Economy (17th ed.). Pearson.
Swarno, Husna Aini, Ali, Rabiatul Adawiyah, Rahman, Mazlinda Abdul, Hussein, Siti Nurliyana Che, Habib, Nor Saiful Hafiz Abd, Zaini, Mohd Saufi Mohd, Othman, Nurnida Elmira, & Ahmad, Nurul Huda. (n.d.). Integrated Climate Risk Management for Enhancing Resilience and Sustainability of Petroleum Exploration in Southeast Asia in the Context of Future Climate Scenarios. Available at SSRN 5509246.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Schedule assessment guide: Best practices for project schedules. U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2020). Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide: Best practices for developing and managing program costs. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wisnugroho, J. (2020). Indonesia Oil & Gas Cost Estimating vs International “Best-Tested and Proven” Practices – A Benchmarking Study. PM World Journal, IX.
Zilikram, M. (2023). Benchmarking Indonesia’s Downstream Oil & Gas Construction: Evaluating Project Scheduling and Cost Estimating Processes Against Global “Best-Tested and Proven” Practices. PM World Journal, 12(10).