Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Efektivitas Penerapan Risk & Control Self Assessment (RCSA) pada Pemrosesan KPR (Studi Kasus: Bank X)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i4.5486Keywords:
Manajemen Risiko, ORM Tools, RCSA, KPR, BankAbstract
Era digitalisasi menuntut semua bidang usaha untuk adaptif terhadap perubahan dan perkembangan teknologi. Transformasi digital menjadi hal yang wajib dilakukan oleh seluruh perusahaan. Bank X sebagai salah satu Bank BUMN juga melakukan transformasi digital di seluruh aspek perbankan. Segala tindakan yang dilakukan perusahaan tak lepas dari kemungkinan terjadinya risiko atas implementasi suatu tindakan atau kegiatan di perusahaan. Melalui konsep 3 lines of defense dalam manajemen risiko operasional, penelitian ini berfokus pada penerapan salah satu Operational Risk Management (ORM) Tools yaitu Risk & Control Self-Assessment (RCSA). Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor internal dan eksternal yang mempengaruhi efektivitas penerapan RCSA dalam pemrosesan KPR periode 2020-2024 dengan metode pengumpulan data dari review dokumen, wawancara, dan observasi serta analisis menggunakan model Miles & Huberman (reduksi data, penyajian data, penarikan kesimpulan) dengan triangulasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor internal seperti kapabilitas dan pengalaman pegawai, tingkat kepentingan unit kerja (yang menimbulkan konflik kepentingan antara lini 1 dan lini 2), serta lemahnya pengawasan pelaksanaan RCSA, bersama dengan faktor eksternal seperti kebijakan regulator (UU PDP) dan insiden khusus (gangguan iDeb SLIK OJK), mempengaruhi tingkat efektivitas penerapan RCSA pada pemrosesan KPR. Efektivitas RCSA baru tercapai sepenuhnya pada tahun 2024 setelah risk library dibentuk kembali.
References
Agustama, R., Pandesenda, A. I., Yahya, A. N., Sukma, E. A., Shihab, M. R., & Ranti, B. (2025). Risk management in IT projects for digital banking: A case study of an Indonesian state-owned bank. Applied Information System and Management (AISM), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i2.46123
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Revisions to the principles for the sound management of operational risk. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org
Cornwell, N., Bilson, C., Gepp, A., Stern, S., & Vanstone, B. (2023). Modernising operational risk management in financial institutions via data-driven causal factors analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102029
Deloitte. (2023). Risk and control self-assessment: Turning compliance into strategic value. Deloitte Insights.
Ferreira, S., & Dickason-Koekemoer, Z. (2020). A conceptual model of operational risk events in the banking sector. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1706394. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1706394
Haryanti, R. A., Anugrah, B., Gustama, A., Rahmadani, D. F., & Tantri, F. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on organizational performance and operational risks in banking sector. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 347–356.
Hendra, M., & Rosmita, R. (2023). Personal data protection law in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 13(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2015). Manajemen risiko 1. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Institute of Internal Auditors. (2020). The IIA’s three lines model: An update of the three lines of defense. https://www.theiia.org
Joshi, M., & Mahadevan, B. (2024). Operational risk management in banks: A bibliometric analysis and opportunities for future research. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030095
Kaushal, S., Sharma, S., & Gupta, N. (2024). The recent issues and challenges of operational risk management in the banking industry: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business and Technology (pp. 53–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97613-1_53
Lin, D., Tang, X., Li, H., & He, G. (2023). An empirical research on employee welfare and internal control quality. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0290009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290009
Lois, P., Drogalas, G., Doulgeridis, K., & Petridis, K. (2020). Critical variables in the implementation of a risk-based internal audit: A theoretical and empirical investigation of Greek companies. Journal of Operational Risk, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2020.246
Maulana, A., Saudi, M. H. M., Sinaga, O., & Prastiwi, D. (2024). Risk management as a determinant of Indonesian banking financial performance: A systematic literature approach. Indo-Fintech Intellectuals: Journal of Economics and Business, 4(5), 2523–2537. https://doi.org/10.54373/ifijeb.v4i5.2120
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Napitupulu, I. H. (2020). Internal control, manager’s competency, management accounting information systems and good corporate governance: Evidence from rural banks in Indonesia. South Asian Journal of Management, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920919845
Ononiwu, M. I., Onwuzulike, O. C., Shitu, K., & Ojo, O. O. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on banking operations in developing economies. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2706
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021, October 26). Cetak biru transformasi digital perbankan. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/info-terkini/Pages/Cetak-Biru-Transformasi-Digital-Perbankan.aspx
Otoo, F. N. K., Kaur, M., & Rather, N. A. (2023). Evaluating the impact of internal control systems on organizational effectiveness. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/LBSJMR-11-2022-0078
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 18/POJK.03/2016 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum. (2016).
Qomaruddin, & Sa’diyah, H. (2024). Kajian teoritis tentang teknik analisis data dalam penelitian kualitatif: Perspektif Spradley, Miles dan Huberman. JOMAA, 1(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.52620/jomaa.v1i2.93
Rahi, A. F., Akter, R., & Johansson, J. (2024). Do sustainability practices and financial regulations mitigate the impact of audit risk on financial reporting quality? International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12010004
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Sumaryati, A., Novitasari, E. P., & Machmuddah, Z. (2020). Accounting information system, internal control system, human resource competency and quality of local government financial statements in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.n10.795
Suryadi, E. (2021). Evaluasi penerapan risk and control self-assessment dalam manajemen risiko operasional (studi kasus pada divisi pinjaman konsumer bank X) [Tesis, STIE Indonesia Banking School].
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. (2022).
Vorst, C. R., Priyarsono, D. S., & Budiman, A. (2018). Manajemen risiko berbasis SNI ISO 31000 (N. Irawan, M. Yekttiningtyas, K. Andriandi, & W. S. Sari, Eds.). Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eka Yuli Agisah, Dominicus Savio Priyarsono, Widodo Ramadyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
