Hybrid Leadership in Culturally Complex Contexts: Integrating Charismatic, Authoritarian, and Democratic Styles to Optimize Employee Performance in Indonesian Higher Education

Authors

  • Muhammad Kafrawi Yunus Universitas Bosowa
  • Muliyadi Hamid Universitas Fajar
  • Badaruddin Badaruddin Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Nobel Indonesia
  • Fransiskus X. Gian Tue Mali Universitas Kristen Indonesia
  • Ayu Larasati Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i2.5626

Keywords:

Hybrid leadership, cultural adaptability, employee performance, Indonesian education

Abstract

 This study examines the interplay of charismatic, authoritarian, and democratic leadership styles on employee performance within Indonesia’s culturally hierarchical higher education sector. It addresses the gap in understanding how hybrid leadership models—combining globally recognized styles with local cultural norms such as hormat (respect for hierarchy) and gotong royong (mutual cooperation)—optimize performance in collectivist settings. A quantitative explanatory approach was employed, utilizing a cross-sectional survey of 85 employees (stratified random sampling) at Bosowa Education, Makassar. Leadership styles were measured using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X) scale, while employee performance was assessed through productivity, creativity, and task adherence metrics. Multiple linear regression analysis (SPSS v28) was conducted to test the hypotheses. Authoritarian leadership showed the strongest effect (? = 0.297, p = 0.003), proving ideal for administrative efficiency, while charismatic leadership significantly motivated teachers (? = 0.259, p = 0.012), aligning with cultural reverence for inspirational figures. Democratic leadership had limited efficacy (? = 0.219, p = 0.045) due to hierarchical decision-making delays. The three styles collectively explained 31.1% of the variance in performance (R² = 0.311, F = 12.186, p < 0.001), with residual factors (e.g., intrinsic motivation, gotong royong) highlighting the need for culturally adaptive strategies. The findings challenge universal leadership theories by emphasizing that effectiveness depends on alignment with bureaucratic norms and local cultural practices. Hybrid models integrating charismatic, authoritarian, and democratic styles—adapted to specific roles and contexts—are essential for optimizing performance in Indonesian higher education.

References

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207.

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207

Brahmasari, I. A. (2004). Pengaruh motivasi kerja, kepemimpinan, dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja perusahaan [The influence of work motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on company performance]. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 10(2), 124–135.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Fazira, A. (2019). The effect of leadership on employee performance at the Library and Archives Office of Dumai City. JMKSP: Journal of Management, Leadership, and Educational Supervision, 4(1), 1–15.

García, J. M., Lee, S., & Rahman, A. (2022). Hybrid leadership in multicultural organizations: A meta-analysis of employee satisfaction. Journal of Global Leadership, 17(3), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1234567

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia [Human Resource Management]. PT Bumi Aksara.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall.

Jamil, R. (2022). Educational reforms in ASEAN: Balancing cultural duality and globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 89, 102567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102567

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Liridon Veliu (2017). The influence of leadership styles on employee’s performance. Vadyba / Journal of Management, 31(2), 23–29.

Marjaya, I. (2019). The effect of leadership, motivation, and training on employee performance. Maneggio: Scientific Journal of Master of Management, 2(1), 129–147.

Nguyen, T. H., Tran, Q. M., & Le, D. A. (2023). Post-pandemic leadership in education: A global review of hybrid frameworks. Educational Management Review, 45(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221145678

Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture, and performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 766–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075114

Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Irwin-Dorsey.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Perilaku organisasi [Organizational Behavior]. PT. Indeks Kelompok GRAMEDIA.

Slovin, E. (1960). Slovin’s formula for sampling technique. Journal of Applied Statistics, 5(2), 1–5.

Sopiah, S. (2008). Perilaku Organisasional [Organizational Behavior]. Penerbit Andi.

Susanto, A. (2021). Generational shifts in Indonesian workplace dynamics: A study of??? structures. Asian Journal of Management Studies, 15(2), 89–104.

Tampubolon, B. D. (2007). Analisis faktor gaya kepemimpinan dan faktor etos kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai [Analysis of leadership style and work ethic factors on employee performance]. Jurnal Standarisasi, 9(3), 106–115.

van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1234567

Wolfe, R. A., & Andrews, K. M. (2014). Hybrid leadership models: A systematic review. Leadership Quarterly, 25(6), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.003

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Kafrawi Yunus, Muliyadi Hamid, Badaruddin Badaruddin, Fransiskus X. Gian Tue Mali, Ayu Larasati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.