Muted Voices and Resilience: Analyzing the Application of Muted Group Theory in Hidden Figures

Main Article Content

Andanareswari Wardhani
Univesitas Indonesia
Zefira Fadryona
Univesitas Indonesia
Irwansyah Irwansyah
Univesitas Indonesia

This study examines the representation of marginalized voices through the lens of Muted Group Theory in the film Hidden Figures. The background of this research is rooted in the persistent issue of gender and racial inequality, where women particularly African American women experience systemic barriers that limit their ability to express themselves within dominant social structures. The objective of this study is to analyze how the dynamics of silencing and resistance are portrayed through language, interaction, and power relations in the film. This research employed a qualitative approach using critical discourse analysis to examine selected scenes and dialogues. Data were collected from six key scenes involving the main characters, and analyzed by categorizing expressions of dominance into four mechanisms: ridicule, ritual, control, and harassment. The findings reveal that the film vividly illustrates how institutional and structural discrimination contributes to the silencing of marginalized groups. Female characters are often excluded, underestimated, and constrained by dominant male authority. However, the analysis also highlights forms of resistance, where the characters challenge these barriers through persistence, competence, and strategic communication. In conclusion, Hidden Figures effectively demonstrates the mechanisms of Muted Group Theory while emphasizing the resilience of marginalized women. The study underscores the importance of inclusive communication and structural change to amplify underrepresented voices in both historical and contemporary contexts.


Keywords: Women empowerment, poverty, marginalization, gender inequity, Sustainable Development Goals
Bodenhausen, G. V, & Richeson, J. A. (2010). Discrimination: Psychological perspectives BT - The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.); pp. 341–356). SAGE Publications.
Cariello, A. N., Xiong, K., & Chan, W. Y. (2024). When experiencing discrimination predicts greater outgroup affiliation: The role of intergroup mobility in moderating rejection-(dis)identification patterns. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 100, 101967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101967
Fershtman, C., Gneezy, U., & Verboven, F. (2005). Discrimination and nepotism: The efficiency of the anonymity rule. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1086/428276
Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2005). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.01.002
Francis, E. K. (1976). Interethnic relations: An essay in sociological theory. Elsevier.
Frauenberger, C. (2012). Gender and the fight for equality. Journal of Feminist Studies, 18(3), 45–58.
Geschwender, J. A. (1978). Racial stratification in America. D. Van Nostrand.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135.
Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford University Press.
Gordon, M. M. (1991). Assimilation in American society: The literature since Gordon. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9(1), 26–41.
Hayes, A. F. (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: Spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00367.x
Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking: Frameworks for analysis. Newbury House.
Lawrence, K., & Keleher, T. (2004). Challenging White supremacy: Advancing racial equity. Race Forward.
Li, J. Y., Sun, R., Tao, W., & Lee, Y. (2021). Coping with workplace racial discrimination: The role of internal communication. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102059
Niu, C., & Rosenthal, S. (2009). The influence of societal structures on muted voices. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00621.x
Pincus, F. L. (2000). Discrimination comes in many forms: Individual, institutional, and structural. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764298040002009
Samari, G., Wurtz, H. M., Abularrage, T. F., & Sharif, M. Z. (2024). Structural gendered racism as conceptualized by immigrant women in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 351, 116396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116396
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and gender roles: Dynamics of social perception. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 44–61.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2021). Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100341