Strategic Decision-Making in The Development Scenario Selection for The Kayu Merah Structure at Jatibarang Field, PT Pertamina EP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i7.5848Keywords:
Strategic Decision-Making, Gas Development, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Upstream Oil and GasAbstract
This research aims to support strategic decision-making in determining the most optimal development scenario for the KYM gas structure through an integrated analytical approach. The research identifies internal and external factors influencing development feasibility, translates stakeholder values into decision criteria, and systematically evaluates alternative scenarios. The method combined qualitative and quantitative approaches through PESTEL analysis, SWOT analysis, Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Primary data were obtained through surveys, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and stakeholder mapping, while secondary data were derived from internal company documents, regulations, technical studies, and academic literature. The results of the environmental analysis were used to formulate fundamental objectives, means objectives, criteria, and sub-criteria for evaluation that align with strategic priorities and stakeholder expectations. The alternative development scenarios were then evaluated using AHP pairwise comparisons, accompanied by consistency ratio testing and sensitivity analysis. The findings indicate that Alternative 1, namely the production flow from KYM-B and KYM-C wells through the construction of a new flowline integrated with existing production toward the Randegan Gathering Station with facility upgrades, is the most optimal scenario. This alternative is superior because it provides a balanced performance across economic, technical-operational, regulatory-environmental, implementation risk, and stakeholder alignment aspects. The sensitivity analysis shows that the selected alternative remains robust against changes in criteria weights, with the project approval target in the second quarter of 2026 and onstream target in the fourth quarter of 2028.
References
Agbede, O. O., Akhigbe, E. E., Ajayi, A. J., & Egbuhuzor, N. S. (2023). Structuring financing mechanisms for LNG plants and renewable energy infrastructure projects globally. IRE Journals, 7(5), 379–392.
Amini-Philips, A., Ibrahim, A. K., & Eyinade, W. (2022). Financing the energy transition: Models for linking decarbonization strategies with corporate performance.
Economides, M. J., Hill, A. D., Ehlig-Economides, C., & Zhu, D. (2013). Petroleum production systems (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Energy Institute. (2024). Statistical review of world energy 2024. https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
International Energy Agency. (2023). Southeast Asia energy outlook 2023. IEA.
International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. IEA.
International Energy Forum. (2023). IEF energy outlook 2023. International Energy Forum.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press.
Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537–549.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2017). Presidential Regulation No. 22 of 2017 concerning the National Energy General Plan (RUEN). Government of Indonesia.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2024). Handbook of energy and economic statistics of Indonesia 2024. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.
National Energy Council. (2022). Indonesia energy outlook 2022. National Energy Council.
PT Pertamina EP. (2024). Annual report 2024. PT Pertamina EP.
PT Pertamina Hulu Energi. (2024). Sustainability report 2024. PT Pertamina Hulu Energi.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Sharif, S. A., & Hammad, A. (2019). Simulation-based multi-objective optimization of institutional building renovation considering energy consumption, life-cycle cost and life-cycle assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 429–445.
SKK Migas. (2024). Annual report 2024. Special Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities.
Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2023). Managing mature oil and gas fields: Best practices for production optimization. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Strong, D., Kay, M., Conner, B., Wakefield, T., & Manogharan, G. (2018). Hybrid manufacturing—Integrating traditional manufacturers with additive manufacturing (AM) supply chain. Additive Manufacturing, 21, 159–173.
Talipova, A., & Parsegov, S. (2018). Evolution of natural gas business model with deregulation, financial instruments, technology solutions, and rising LNG export: Comparative study of projects inside the US and abroad. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, D021S019R005.
World Bank. (2023). Commodity markets outlook: Lower prices, little relief. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hermawan Hermawan, Pri Hermawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




