Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kinerja Ahli Teknologi Laboratorium Medik (ATLM) di Wilayah Pekalongan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i8.5959Keywords:
Ahli Teknologi Laboratorium Medik, Kinerja, Keterampilan Kerja, Kepemimpinan, PenghargaanAbstract
Kinerja Ahli Teknologi Laboratorium Medik (ATLM) memiliki peran penting dalam menjamin mutu pelayanan laboratorium dan keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit. Namun, masih ditemukan berbagai permasalahan yang berpotensi menurunkan kualitas pelayanan, seperti kesalahan pelabelan sampel, ketidaksesuaian penerapan prosedur operasional standar, serta rendahnya kepuasan pasien terhadap pelayanan laboratorium. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kinerja ATLM di rumah sakit wilayah Pekalongan. Penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan desain analitik observasional dan pendekatan cross-sectional. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 124 ATLM yang dipilih menggunakan teknik total sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan uji Chi-Square serta regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan kerja, pengalaman kerja, gaji, kepemimpinan, penghargaan, motivasi, dan sikap memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan kinerja ATLM (p<0,05), sedangkan disiplin kerja tidak menunjukkan hubungan yang signifikan (p=0,222). Analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa penghargaan merupakan faktor yang paling dominan memengaruhi kinerja ATLM (OR=3,437), diikuti oleh keterampilan kerja (OR=3,116) dan kepemimpinan (OR=2,432). Ketiga variabel tersebut secara bersama-sama mampu menjelaskan 32,6% variasi kinerja ATLM. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peningkatan sistem penghargaan, pengembangan keterampilan, dan penguatan kepemimpinan merupakan strategi penting untuk meningkatkan kinerja ATLM serta mendukung mutu pelayanan laboratorium di rumah sakit.
References
Abbasi, M. (2022). Identifying and weighting of dimensions and indicators of individual job performance using fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process techniques. 15(1), 99–112.
Alshammari, K. F., Alshammari, F. M., Alanazi, A. R., Aldhafeeri, O., & Alshammari, W. H. (2021). The Impact Of Technological Advancements On Medical Laboratory Practice: A Critical Review. 11, 45336–45342.
Bozzetti, M., Lo Cascio, A., Napolitano, D., Orgiana, N., Mora, V., & Fiorini, S. (2025). Measuring What Matters in Trial Operations: Development and Validation of the Clinical Trial Site Performance Measure. 1–14.
Cherie, N., Deress, T., Wolde, M., Teketelew, B. B., Tamir, M., & Angelo, A. A. (2024). Performances and determinants of proficiency testing in clinical laboratory services at comprehensive specialized hospitals, northwest Ethiopia. Scientific Reports, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58525-6
Gajjar, D., & Agravatt, A. (2024). Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in Consideration with Pre analytical and Post analytical Quality Indicators. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 39(2), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-022-01094-0
Gumelar, A. (2025). Strategy for Building Optimal Performance of Medical Laboratory Technologists: Synergy of Organizational Culture and Work Environment with Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable. 5(6), 6211–6219.
Htun, K. A. (2024). A Study on Work Engagement Among Faculty Members in a Medical University. Yangon University of Economics, Department of Applied Economics, Master of Public Administration Programme.
Id, S. K., Chhabra, G., Sehrawat, K. S., & Singh, M. (2024). Developing a competency assessment framework for medical laboratory technologists in primary healthcare settings. PLOS ONE, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294939
Iso-Ahola, S. E. (2024). A theory of the skill-performance relationship. 1–16.
Johnsen, Å., Solholm, K., & Tufte, P. A. (2024). Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(4), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2360158
Kerja, E., & Petugas, P. (2025). Jurnal Kesehatan Cendikia Jenius. 3(1).
Laboratorium, D. I., & Sawit, D. (2023). Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pra-Analitik Pada Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Puasa (Pre-Analytical Internal Quality Assurance in Fasting Blood Glucose Testing). 5, 58–64.
Lam, J. C., & Church, D. L. (2024). Preventing laboratory error and improving patient safety – The role of non-laboratory trained healthcare professionals. Clinical Infection in Practice, 21, 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinpr.2024.100345
Marsudi, L. O., & Mawardani, M. T. (2024). Hubungan Tingkat Kepatuhan ATLM Terhadap Mutu Pelayanan Laboratorium X (The Relationship between ATLM Compliance Levels and the Quality of Laboratory X Services). 4(2), 31–36.
Masyarakat, P., & Kabupaten, D. (2020). AkMen. 17, 438–449.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Kell, H. J. (n.d.). Job Performance (pp. 1–61). Rice University.
Mulatie, Z., Ebrahim, E., Alebachew, M., & Gedefie, A. (2025). Performance Analysis of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Using Sigma Metrics in the Total Testing Process at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. 1–13.
Parker, S. K., Tims, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2025). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Work Design: A Multilevel Perspective on How Job Crafting and Work Characteristics Interrelate. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-025-10010-1
Procena, V., Evaluacija, O. I., Ko, K., Tehni, L., Pandemije, U. J., & Ka, C. P. (2022). Virtual Assessment, Training, And Evaluation Of Clinical Laboratory Technologists Amidst Peak Covid-19 Pandemic – An Observational Study. 41(4), 559–563.
Rahmattuhan, D., Esa, M., & Indonesia, P. R. (2023). Tumpah Darah.
Rizk, M. M., Zaki, A., Hossam, N., & Aboul-Ela, Y. (2014). Evaluating laboratory key performance using quality indicators in Alexandria University Hospital Clinical Chemistry Laboratories. 105–113.
Rondeau, A. (2026). [Review of the book Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes, by J. L. Gibson, J. M. Ivancevich, & J. H. Donnelly Jr.]. Relations Industrielles.
Saleem, M., Wong, W., Huang, X. Z., & Badrick, T. (2021). A current analysis of quality indicators in Chinese clinical laboratories. 3, 1–13.
Schröder, V. S., Ingold, P. V, Heimann, A. L., & Roulin, N. (2025). Blind Spots in Assessing and Predicting Key Dimensions of Job Performance: An Examination of Supervisor and Self-Ratings. Human Performance, 38(3), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2025.2515359
Utami, H. N., Prasetya, A., & Hutahayan, B. (2025). Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Employee Performance Research: A Bibliometric and Mapping Analysis (2020–2025). 1–22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agus Riyanto, Ayun Sriyatmi , Cahya Tri Purnamil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
