Exploring the Servant Leadership, Work Engagement, and Public Service Motivation among Civil Servants’ Sport Council of Ministry of Interior in the Cambodian Setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i6.6052Keywords:
beliefs, perceptions, mathematics teaching, empirical evidences, high school, Teacher, cambodiaAbstract
Public mistrust and growing aspirations for legitimacy in public administration characterize Cambodia's institutional environment. This quantitative study with a non-experimental design aimed to investigate the relationships between servant leadership, work engagement, public service motivation, and healthy organizational outcomes in the Cambodian public sector within the framework of the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) theory and the Healthy and Resilient Organizations (HERO) model, taking into account the moderating effect of the supervisor's gender. Using established instruments, this study evaluated servant leadership, public service motivation, work engagement, and organizational results in a sample of 280 civil servants from the Ministry of Interior's Sport Council selected through convenience sampling technique. The five hypotheses were validated through structural equation modeling: servant leadership was positively correlated with public service motivation (B= 0.18, p < 0.001) and work engagement (B= 0.15, p= 0.002), while work engagement was positively correlated with healthy organizational outcomes (B= 0.47, p < 0.001), demonstrating partial mediation effects among these variables. The supervisor's gender did not have any moderating influence on the proposed relationships. In addition to highlighting the importance of servant leadership as a crucial social resource for promoting motivation, work engagement, and organizational well-being within the particular context of Cambodian public institutions, this study offers empirical evidence on the motivational mechanisms functioning within the public sector. The findings contribute to the integration of JD-R theory and the HERO model in public administration research, providing practical implications for developing more inclusive and healthy organizations in the Cambodian public sector.
References
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. [CrossRef]
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. [CrossRef]
Bakker, A. B. (2015). A job demands-resources approach to public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 723–732. [CrossRef]?
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2023). Job demands-resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. [CrossRef]
Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2010). Examining gender differences of servant leadership: An analysis of the agentic and communal properties of the servant leadership questionnaire. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 4–22. [CrossRef]?
Borst, R. T. (2018). Comparing work engagement in people-changing and people-processing service providers: A mediation model with red tape, autonomy, dimensions of PSM, and performance. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 287–313. [CrossRef]?
Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., Lako, C. J., & de Vries, M. S. (2019). The attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes of work engage- ment: A comparative meta-analysis across the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 488–516. [CrossRef]
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78. [CrossRef]?
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124–141. [CrossRef]?
Christensen, R. K., Paarlberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542. [CrossRef]?
costa-Antognoni, H., Torrente, P., Llorens Gumbau, S., & Salanova, M. (2013). Prácticas organizacionales saludables: Un análisis exploratorio de su impacto relativo sobre el engagement con el trabajo [Healthy organizational practices: An exploratory analysis of their relative impact on work engagement]. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social, 2(1), 107–120.
Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2019). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69–95. [CrossRef]?
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. [CrossRef]?
De Simone, S., Cicotto, G., Pinna, R., & Giustiniano, L. (2016). Engaging public servants: Public service motivation, work engagement and work-related stress. Management Decision, 54(7), 1569–1594. [CrossRef]?
Duff, A. J. (2013). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(3), 204–221. [CrossRef]?
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. [CrossRef]?
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Publishing Center.?
Hameduddin, T., & Engbers, T. (2021). Leadership and public service motivation: A systematic synthesis. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 86–119. [CrossRef]?
Han, S. H., Sung, M., & Suh, B. (2020). Linking meaningfulness to work outcomes through job characteristics and work engagement. Human Resource Development International, 24(1), 3–22. [CrossRef]
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 632–643. [CrossRef]
Hogue, M. (2016). Gender bias in communal leadership: Examining servant leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 837–849. [CrossRef]
Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E. (2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316–31. [CrossRef]
Jonker, C. S., & Dube, S. C. (2025). Servant leadership and well-being: A scoping review of positive organisational outcomes. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 23, a2783. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., & De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. [CrossRef]
Lemoine, G. J., & Blum, T. C. (2019). Servant leadership, leader gender, and team gender role: Testing a female advantage in a cascading model of performance. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 3–28. [CrossRef]
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C., & Leroy, H. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187. [CrossRef]
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177. [CrossRef]
Llorens, S., Martínez, I. M., & Salanova, M. (2017). Organizaciones saludables y resilientes [Healthy and resilient organizations]. In S. de Toledo, & N. Silva (Eds.), Psicología positiva nas organizaciones e no trabalho (pp. 63–75). Vetor.
Mayer, D. (2010). Servant leadership and follower need satisfaction. In D. Van Dierendonck, & K. Patterson (Eds.), Servant leadership. Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef]
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107. [CrossRef]
Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., Mikkelsen, K. S., & Schuster, C. (2019). The causal effect of public service motivation on ethical behavior in the public sector: Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 445–459. [CrossRef]
Montecinos, C., González, Á., & Ehren, M. (2020). From hierarchy and market to hierarchy and network governance in Chile: Enhancing accountability, capacity and trust in public education. In M. Ehren, & J. Baxter (Eds.), Trust, accountability and capacity in education system reform: Global Perspectives in comparative education (pp. 201–221). Taylor and Francis Inc. [CrossRef]
Neubert, M. J., Sully de Luque, M., Quade, M. J., & Hunter, E. M. (2022). Servant leadership across the globe: Assessing universal and culturally contingent relevance in organizational contexts. Journal of World Business, 57(2). [CrossRef]
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Teoría psicométrica [Psychometric theory] (J. A. Velázquez Arellano, & M. Terán Guillén, Trans.; 3.a ed., 2.a ed. en español). McGraw-Hill.
Van Veldhoven, M., Van den Broeck, A., Daniels, K., Bakker, A. B., Tavares, S. M., & Ogbonnaya, C. (2020). Challenging the universality of job resources: Why, when, and for whom are they beneficial? Applied Psychology, 69(1), 5–29. [CrossRef]
Villarroel-Núñez, D., Acosta-Antognoni, H., Salanova Soria, M., & Villacura-Herrera, C. (2024). The chilean public sector: A healthy and resilient organization. Adaptation and validation of the HEROCheck public instrument with a gender perspective. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 31(4), 501–520. [CrossRef]
Olvera, J., Llorens, S., Acosta, H., & Salanova, M. (2017). El liderazgo transformacional y la confianza como antecedentes del desempeño en equipo en el ámbito sanitario. Anales de Psicología, 33(2), 365–375. [CrossRef]
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (2024). Panorama de las administraciones públicas: América latina y el caribe 2024 [Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2024]. OECD Publishing. [CrossRef]
Park, Y., Lim, D. H., Kim, W., & Kang, H. (2020). Organizational support and adaptive performance: The revolving structural relationships between job crafting, work engagement, and adaptive performance. Sustainability, 12(12), 4872. [CrossRef]
Perry, J., & Wise, L. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. [CrossRef]
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. [CrossRef] [PubMed]?
Rainey, H., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32. [CrossRef]
Reynolds, K. (2011). Servant-leadership as gender-integrative leadership: Paving a path for more gender-integrative organizations through leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 155–171. [CrossRef]?
Reynolds, K. (2014). Servant-leadership: A feminist perspective. The International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 10(1), 35–63. [CrossRef]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. [CrossRef]
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Martínez, I. M. (2012). We need a hero! Toward a validation of the Healthy and Resilient Organization (HERO) model. Group & Organization Management, 37, 785–822. [CrossRef]
Salanova, M. (2021). Work engagement: A key to HEROs–healthy and resilient organizations. In A research agenda for employee engagement in a changing world of work (pp. 53–65). Edward Elgar Publishing. [CrossRef]
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. [CrossRef]
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006a). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. [CrossRef]
Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2006b). Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. J. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Edward Elgar.
Schwarz, G., Newman, A., Cooper, B., & Eva, N. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025–1041. [CrossRef]
Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). The job demands-resources model. In The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational safety and workplace health (pp. 155–180). Wiley. [CrossRef]
Tian, G., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., & Wen, Y. (2019). Self-efficacy and work performance: The role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(12), 1–7. [CrossRef]
Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Teams make it work: How teamwork engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema, 24(1), 106–112. [PubMed]
Tummers, L. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and job demand-resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722080. [CrossRef]
Ugaddan, R. G., & Park, S. M. (2017). Quality of leadership and public service motivation: A social exchange perspective on work engagement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(3), 270–285. [CrossRef]
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Informe sobre desarrollo humano en Chile 2024: ¿Por qué nos cuesta cambiar? Conducir los cambios para un desarrollo humano sostenible [Human Development Report in Chile 2024: Why is change so difficult? Driving change for sustainable human development]. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. [CrossRef]
van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business & Psychology, 26, 249–267. [CrossRef]
van Dierendonck, D., Sousa, M., Gunnarsdóttir, S., Bobbio, A., Hakanen, J., Armin, P. V., Emin, C. D., & Rodriguez-Carvajal, R. (2017). The cross-cultural invariance of the servant leadership survey: A comparative study across eight countries. Administrative Sciences, 7(2), 8. [CrossRef]
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141. [CrossRef]
Xu, H., Zhong, M., & Liden, R. C. (2020). The state of the art in academic servant leadership research: A systematic review. In J. C. Burkhardt, & J. Y. Joslin (Eds.), Inspiration for servant-leaders: Lessons from fifty years of research and practice (pp. 46–102). Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
Zahari, N., & Kaliannan, M. (2022). Antecedents of work engagement in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(3), 557–582. [CrossRef]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kimseng Sok, Sarom Mok, Mengheang Hor, Sothea Lim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
