Reciprocal Teaching as a Catalyst for Cognitive Transformation: Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking Among Indonesian Pre-College Students
Downloads
This quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of the Reciprocal Teaching Strategy (RTS) on the reading comprehension abilities and critical thinking skills of Indonesian pre-college students in Kecamatan Ampek Angkek, West Sumatera. Against a national backdrop in which only 6.06% of Indonesian students demonstrate reading proficiency, this study addressed a critical educational need. A sample of 42 students was divided into experimental and control groups. Pre- and post-test instruments assessed both reading comprehension (20 multiple-choice items) and critical thinking (open-ended HOTS items aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy levels C4–C6). Statistical analyses included Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, Levene's homogeneity tests, paired-samples t-tests, independent-samples t-tests, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). For reading comprehension, the experimental group's mean score increased from 47.75 to 65.50 (t = ?6.427, p < .001), while the control group achieved a mean score of 65.3 compared with 78.5 for the experimental group (t = 4.223, p = .001). For critical thinking, mean scores increased from 48.25 to 64.75 (t = ?7.422, p < .001), with the experimental group outperforming the control group by 11.8 points (t = 5.690, p < .001). Multivariate analysis (MANOVA; Wilks' ? = .018, F = 616.06, p < .001) confirmed a robust and statistically significant effect of RTS on both outcomes simultaneously. These findings provide compelling evidence that RTS is a transformative pedagogical intervention capable of fostering higher-order literacy skills in high-stakes pre-college contexts. The implications for curriculum integration, teacher professional development, and national literacy policy in Indonesia are discussed.
Arifiyanti, F. (2020). Reciprocal Teaching As a Technique To Promote Students’ Critical Thinking in Comprehending a Text for Senior High School Students. RETAIN: Research of English Language Teaching In Indonesia , 8(3), 160–166.
Ayun, Q., & Yunus, M. (2018). the Efficacy of Reciprocal Teaching Method in Teaching Reading Comprehension To Efl Students. ELT Echo?: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 2(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v2i2.2174
Budiasih, B., & Dewi, F. A. I. (2019). a Learning Model Development of Critical Reading Comprehension Through Reciprocal Teaching. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 4(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v4i1.1516
Cakici, D. (2018). Metacognitive Awareness and Critical Thinking Abilities of Pre-service EFL Teachers. 7(5), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p116
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. Microbe Magazine, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1
Dew, T. P., Swanto, S., & Pang, V. (2021). Reciprocal Teaching and Reading Comprehension?: An Integrative Review. 3(1), 1–12.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002239
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research?: competencies for analysis and applications. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (10th ed, Vol. 11, Issue 1). Pearson.
Herlina, N., Hilir, R., & Pengarayaan, P. (2017). the Use of Reciprocal Strategy in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching, 105–112.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into Second Language Reading. Insights into Second Language Reading. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524841
Kurniati, R., Daud, A., & Masyhur, M. (2023). Reading Interest and Reading Comprehension Ability: The Correlational Study in Secondary Education. JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v2i1.6547
Lestari, A. A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Method Embedding Critical Thinking Towards MIA Second Graders’ Reading Comprehension of MAN 1 Kendari. Journal of Teaching English, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36709/jte.v4i1.13898
Metsäpelto, R. L., Silinskas, G., Kiuru, N., Poikkeus, A. M., Pakarinen, E., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2017). Externalizing behavior problems and interest in reading as predictors of later reading skills and educational aspirations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.03.009
Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1720946
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing Students ’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249
Oczkus, L. D. (2003). Reciprocal Teaching at Work: powerful Strategies and Lessons for Improving Reading comprehension (2nd ed). DE:International Reading Association.
Okkinga, M., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., van Steensel, R., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2021). Implementation quality of principles of reciprocal teaching in whole-classroom settings: a two-year study with low-achieving adolescents. Reading Psychology, 42(4), 323–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1887019
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. B. (1984). Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension- Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities. Cognition And Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102
Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2002). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life Take-Aways. Financial Times Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
Pilonieta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal Teaching for the Primary Grades: “We Can Do It, Too!” The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.63.2.3
Pilten, G. (2019). The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on Comprehension of Expository Texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i10.1791
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding. In The ASHA Leader (Vol. 22, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.ov.22102017.np
Sriwahyuni, F. L., Febriani, R. B., & Thoyyibah, L. (2020). Reciprocal Teaching of Reading To Promote Students’ Critical Thinking. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v4i2.3894
Yousefi, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). Critical thinking and reading comprehension among postgraduate students: The case of gender and language proficiency level. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 802–807. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.23
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatimah Firdaus, Absharini Kardena , Melyann Melani , Widya Syafitri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
