Evaluation of the Implementation Program Uma Naroman Project for the Community in Bibileo Village, Sub-District Viqueque City, Viqueque Municipality in 2023

Authors

  • Carolina da Cruz Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e
  • Martinho Mendes Pereira Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e
  • Mariano Pinto Amaral Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e
  • Ana Maria do Rosario Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e
  • Tomas Pereira Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e
  • Moises Aparicio Pires Universidade Oriental Timor Lorosa'e

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v5i7.6202

Keywords:

Evaluation Implementation, Program Uma Naroman Project for the Community

Abstract

The Uma Naroman ba Povu (UNP) program is a government initiative in Timor-Leste designed to provide decent and affordable housing for low-income families, addressing the fundamental need for adequate shelter as a basic human right. This study evaluated the implementation of the UNP program in Bibileo Village, Viqueque Municipality, in 2023. The research employed a qualitative descriptive method using data collection techniques, including direct observation, in-depth interviews, and literature review. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model proposed by Miles and Huberman, which involved data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion verification. The findings revealed several significant and interconnected issues across five key dimensions: physical construction, occupant health, location, facilities, and accessibility. Specifically, many houses experienced poor construction quality, including damaged roofs, cracked foundations, and inadequate sanitation facilities. Health-related standards were not fully achieved due to limited waste disposal systems and insufficient access to clean water facilities. Geographically, many houses were located far from essential public services, such as schools and healthcare facilities, while basic amenities, including dining areas and electricity, were frequently unavailable. Furthermore, the implementation process was affected by weak supervision from the Ministry of State Administration and the Social Audit Unit, resulting in housing outcomes that did not fully meet expected standards. Community involvement in decision-making processes remained limited, creating opportunities for political influence and favoritism in beneficiary selection. This study highlights that improving the effectiveness of the UNP program requires stronger monitoring mechanisms, increased community participation, and stricter compliance with technical and health standards to ensure sustainable benefits for targeted beneficiaries.

References

Adriyadi, Rusfiana, & Ernawati. (2025). Implementation of decent housing policy for communities in Sumedang Regency, West Java Province. Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(5).

Anderson, J. E. (1978). Public policy making. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Arikunto, S. (2009). Research procedures: A practical approach. Rineka Cipta.

Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Ellis. (2020). Meaning, discourse, and society. In Crafting Society. Telkom University.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.859643

Lubis. (2008). Palm trees (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) in Indonesia (2nd ed.). Palm Tree Research Center.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications.

Pele, E. S. (2023). Evaluation of the implementation of the decent housing program in Golo Meni Village, North Komba District, East Manggarai Regency (Undergraduate thesis). Catholic University Widya Mandira Kupang.

Sar?ipek, D. B., Peker, Z., & Cerev, G. (2024). Addressing the housing crisis: Insights from a study on university students in Turkey. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 14, 54–69.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam et al. (Eds.), Evaluation in education and human service. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta.

Suhendar, F. (2016). Interactive multimedia-based virtual tour application using Autodesk 3Ds Max. ProTek Info (Development of Computer Engineering Research and Observations), 3, 30–35.

Sulandari, Upe, & Jabar. (2024). Implementation of decent housing assistance program for low-income communities in 2019–2023 (Study in Gunung Sari Village, Bonegunu District, North Buton Regency). Journal of Social Welfare Science, 6(1).

Sumayang. (2013). Fundamentals of production and operations management. PT Salemba Emban Patria.

Tarigan. (2006). Regional development planning. Bumi Aksara.

Tjiptono, F. (2014). Service management (1st ed.). ANDI.

Tsipianitis, & Mandellos. (2022). The value of formative evaluation in an education program. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 9(4), 381–388.

Widodo. (2010). Robotika: Its theory and implementation. Andi Publisher.

Zainal, A. (2012). Public policy. Salemba Humanika.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01