Model Penilaian Bahaya Konstruksi Berbasis Linguistik: Pengembangan Construction Project Hazard Index (CPHI)
Downloads
Industri konstruksi minyak dan gas memiliki tingkat bahaya tinggi akibat kompleksitas pekerjaan multidisiplin, sistem proses, penggunaan alat berat, dan kondisi lapangan yang dinamis. Penilaian berbasis matriks risiko konvensional belum mampu merepresentasikan profil bahaya proyek secara hierarkis dan menyeluruh. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan mengevaluasi Construction Project Hazard Index (CPHI) sebagai model penilaian bahaya berbasis linguistik pada proyek konstruksi migas. Penelitian kuantitatif dengan pendekatan pengembangan model ini mengidentifikasi delapan komponen dan 24 atribut bahaya, kemudian menerapkannya pada Proyek EPF X di Sumatera Selatan. Tiga pemangku kepentingan menilai severity dan frequency setiap atribut. Penilaian linguistik dikonversi menggunakan Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number dan Fuzzy Risk Index, dibobotkan melalui Analytical Hierarchy Process, lalu diagregasi dengan Choquet fuzzy integral dalam kerangka Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Hasil menunjukkan nilai CPHI sebesar 0,5373 dalam kategori tinggi. Process and System Complexity memberikan kontribusi terbesar, sedangkan metode pelaksanaan dan ketidaksesuaian prosedur kerja memiliki nilai risiko atribut tertinggi sebesar 0,7144. Validasi expert judgment menghasilkan skor rata-rata 4,70 atau sangat valid. Analisis sensitivitas menunjukkan model stabil terhadap perubahan bobot global hingga ±10%, meskipun paling sensitif terhadap komponen Process and System Complexity. Disimpulkan bahwa CPHI layak digunakan sebagai alat penilaian untuk memprioritaskan pengendalian bahaya, inspeksi, dan alokasi sumber daya keselamatan pada proyek konstruksi migas.
Ahmadi, F., Sadeghi-Yarandi, M., Ghiyasi, S., Mousavi, M., & Soltanzadeh, A. (2025). Advancing Construction Safety: A Hybrid Construction Safety Hazard Index and Kernel Density Estimation Approach for Assessing Construction Safety Hazards. Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251366999
Almaskati, D., Kermanshachi, S., Pamidimukkala, A., & Yin, Z. (2024). A Review on Construction Safety: Hazards, Mitigation Strategies, and Impacted Sectors. Buildings, 14(2), 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020526
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-467684
Choe, S., & Leite, F. (2017). Assessing Safety Hazard Among Different Construction Trades: Quantitative Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(5), 4016133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001237
Executive, H. and S. (2001). Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s Decision-Making Process. HSE Books.
Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk Management and Construction. Blackwell Scientific.
Grabisch, M. (1996). The Application of Fuzzy Integrals in Multicriteria Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00176-X
Ilbahar, E., Kara?an, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A Novel Approach to Hazard Assessment for Occupational Health and Safety Using Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Inference System. Safety Science, 103, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
Indonesia, K. E. dan S. D. M. R. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Nomor 32 Tahun 2021 tentang Inspeksi Teknis dan Pemeriksaan Keselamatan Instalasi dan Peralatan pada Kegiatan Usaha Minyak dan Gas Bumi. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia.
Indonesia, P. R. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 50 Tahun 2012 tentang Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3).
Institute, P. M. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). PMI.
Mahdinia, M., Yarandi, M. S., Jafarinia, E., & Soltanzadeh, A. (2021). Development of a New Technique for Safety Risk Assessment in Construction Projects Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering.
Majumder, D., Debnath, J., & Biswas, A. (2013). Risk Analysis in Construction Sites Using Fuzzy Reasoning and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Procedia Technology, 10, 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.401
Mansor, M. A., & Flayyih, S. S. (2025). Hazard Assessment of Prefabricated Construction in Iraq Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation. Buildings, 15(10), 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101622
Patel, D. A., & Jha, K. N. (2017). Developing a Process to Evaluate Construction Project Safety Hazard Index Using the Possibility Approach in India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), 4016081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001205
Patel, D. J., & Patel, D. A. (2025). Development of Demolition Project Hazard Index Using the Possibility Approach. International Journal of Construction Management.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill.
Seni?, A., Simi?, N., Dobrodolac, M., & Stojadinovi?, Z. (2025). Development of a Hybrid Model for Hazard Assessment and Management in Complex Road Infrastructure Projects. Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052736
Soltanzadeh, A., Mahdinia, M., Jafarinia, E., Golmohammadpour, H., & Sadeghi-Yarandi, M. (2023). Occupational Safety Risk Analysis in Construction Sites Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study in a Large Construction Project. Work, 76(2), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220086
Standardization, I. O. for. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 – Risk Management: Guidelines. ISO.
Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy Set Theory: Advancing Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects. (2024). Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
Tah, J. H. M., & Carr, V. (2000). A Proposal for Construction Project Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024905
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6
Triantaphyllou, E., & Sánchez, A. (1997). A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. Decision Sciences, 28(1), 151–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01306.x
Yazdani-Chamzini, A. (2014). Proposing a New Methodology Based on Fuzzy Logic for Tunnelling Hazard Assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843583
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zhao, X. (2024). Construction Risk Management Research: Intellectual Structure and Emerging Themes. International Journal of Construction Management.
Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the Key Risks in Construction Projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001
Copyright (c) 2026 Iqbal Prasetya Barrelvi, Tri Joko Wahyu Adi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
