Oversight, Accountability, and Reform: A Historical Study of The Formation of The Police Professional Standards Division (Propam)
Downloads
The establishment of the Professional and Security Division (Divisi Profesi dan Pengamanan, Propam) of the Indonesian National Police (Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Polri) represented a significant aspect of the institutional transformation of the police following Indonesia's post-1998 reform era. Propam has traditionally been regarded as an internal oversight body responsible for enforcing discipline and professional codes of ethics among Polri personnel. However, this perspective tends to emphasize its administrative functions while overlooking the political and institutional circumstances underlying its establishment. This study aimed to critically examine the historical process of Propam's formation within the broader framework of police reform in Indonesia. The research employed a qualitative methodology with a historical-juridical approach, drawing on a review of legislation, regulatory documents, scholarly literature, and security sector reform reports. The findings suggested that Propam's establishment was driven not only by the need to strengthen internal oversight but also by Polri's institutional efforts to establish legitimacy as a professional civilian law enforcement organization following its separation from the military structure. Furthermore, Propam's institutional position presented a structural dilemma, as its oversight responsibilities were exercised within the same organization whose personnel and activities it was tasked with supervising. This arrangement created potential tensions between institutional loyalty and the demands of public accountability. Consequently, the study concluded that Propam's effectiveness depended not only on its formal authority but also on the independence, transparency, and public credibility of its internal oversight mechanisms
Ahmed, H., Haider, D., & Vyborny, K. (2026). The unintended consequences of accountability: Quasi-experimental evidence from policing in Pakistan. Journal of Public Economics, 258, 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105614
Arifianto, A. (2014). Police Reform in Indonesia: From Militarism to Civil Policing. Journal of Police Science, 8(2), 45.
Bayley, D. H. (1990). Patterns of Policing: A Comparative International Analysis. Rutgers University Press.
Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the Future. Oxford University Press.
Boehme, H. M., & Schnell, C. (2022). Why did the use of force go up? Investigating the unexpected impact of a body-worn camera program on a use of force time series. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101944
Bolaji, Q., & Metcalfe, C. (2026). Do interactions with the police correlate with identity formation? Examining the relationship between police legitimacy, procedural justice, and self-identification over time. Journal of Criminal Justice, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102589
Bolger, P. C., & Walters, G. D. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.01.001
Cross, A. R., & Fine, A. D. (2024). Are police as “guardian-oriented” as they should be? Expectation-reality discrepancies are related to perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102260
Cubitt, T. I. C., Gaub, J. E., & Holtfreter, K. (2022). Gender differences in serious police misconduct: A machine-learning analysis of the New York Police Department (NYPD). Journal of Criminal Justice, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101976
Dario, L. M., Cesar, G. T., Jalbert, K., & de la Torre, F. (2024). Quantifying the impact: From prevalence to harm in evaluating police misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 93, 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102229
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
Guo, S., & Wu, Y. (2026). Public cooperation with AI-enabled policing: Testing a socio-technical legitimacy model. Journal of Criminal Justice, 104, 102674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102674
Harris, J. W., & Jones, M. S. (2020). Shaping youths’ perceptions and attitudes toward the police: Differences in direct and vicarious encounters with police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101674
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Harvard University Press.
Kim, T. (2025). Facilitating police reform: Body cameras, police-involved homicides, and law enforcement outcomes. Journal of Public Economics, 248, 105424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105424
Mardiasmo. (2009). Public Sector Accountability. Andi.
Marier, C. J. (2024). Justifiability and culpability in lethal self-defense: Police officers vs. civilians. Journal of Criminal Justice, 90, 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102142
Peacock, R. P. (2022). The generalizability of public judgments of procedural justice across police interaction and demographic variables. Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101999
Sarpong, D. (2024). National identification and public cooperation with the police in Ghana. Journal of Criminal Justice, 94, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102235
Sutrisno, B. (2016). The Role of the Propam Division in Internal Supervision of the Indonesian National Police. Journal of Law and Police, 10(1), 23.
Taylor, O. E. V., Philpot, R., Fitton, O., Walkington, Z., & Levine, M. (2024). Police whistleblowing: A systematic review of the likelihood (and the barriers and facilitators) of the willingness of police officers to report the misconduct of fellow officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 91, 102170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102170
Terry, G. R. (1977). Principles of Management. Richard D. Irwin.
Copyright (c) 2026 Bagus Cahyo Sakti, Singgih Tri S, Yety Rochwulaningsih, Haryono Rinard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





