Determining Solutions to Supply Chain Disruptions in Construction Projects: A Case Study of the Physical Construction of Padat Karya Flats Phase II
Downloads
Supply chain disruptions pose significant challenges to construction projects by delaying material procurement, increasing costs, and adversely affecting project performance. However, limited research has systematically identified and prioritized effective mitigation strategies. This study aimed to identify the internal and external factors contributing to supply chain disruptions and determine priority solutions and adaptive strategies for contractors involved in the Phase II Construction Project of the Padat Karya Flats in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta (Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, DKI Jakarta), Indonesia. A mixed-methods case study approach integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses was employed. Data were obtained from project procurement records, monthly progress reports, and meeting minutes covering January to June 2026. The data were analyzed using Pareto analysis, focus group discussions (FGDs), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, Cartesian quadrant analysis, and stakeholder mapping. The findings identified geopolitical factors (21.62%), exchange rate fluctuations (20.27%), increases in raw material prices (17.57%), material shortages (9.46%), and financial disruptions (8.11%) as the primary causes of supply chain disruptions. The AHP results identified procurement strategy as the highest-priority criterion (41.62%), while integrated procurement systems (32%) and procurement diversification (31%) emerged as the leading strategic alternatives. The SWOT analysis identified procurement diversification as the preferred strategy, with a total score of 3.82 and a position in Quadrant I, indicating favorable conditions for implementing a proactive strategy. These findings suggest that supplier diversification, supported by integrated procurement systems and strengthened internal procurement policies, could enhance supply chain resilience, minimize procurement risks, and improve contractor adaptability to disruptions in construction projects.
Amalia, K., Abma, D. V, & Abma, V. (2023). Risiko Dalam Penerapan Rantai Pasok Material Pada Proyek Infrastruktur Jalan.
Arif, R., & Gunawan, A. (2023). Diagram Pareto dan diagram fishbone: Penyebab yang mempengaruhi keterlambatan pengadaan barang di perusahaan industri petrochemicals Cilegon periode 2020–2022. 7(1), 1–10.
Ariwibowo, M. L. (2025). Upaya peningkatan kinerja infrastruktur jalan di Kota Tegal: Evaluasi dan sasaran capaian target indikator kemantapan jalan kota. VIII(3), 499–520.
Artana, K. B., Masroeri, A. A., & Irawan, M. I. (2011). Penerapan sistem pakar untuk pengembangan strategi. 2011(SNATI), 17–18.
Asnudin, A. (2023). MK-11 Dampak COVID-19 terhadap penyedia jasa konstruksi di wilayah Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah: Studi kasus kontraktor di Palu, Donggala, Sigi (Pasigala). (November), 16–17.
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon. International Journal of Project Management.
Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. 153–180.
Bian, F., et al. (2020). Identifikasi faktor pengaruh dominan keterlambatan proyek akibat rantai pasok pada pengadaan pelat beton pracetak. 3(4), 1295–1304.
Biemo, P., & Soemardi, W. (2024). Orasi ilmiah Guru Besar Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Cozzolino, A., & Verona, G. (2024). Dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity, and strategic alliances. 745–769.
Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38, 131–156. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x
Dawis, A. M., et al. (2023). Pengantar metodologi penelitian.
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). Ripple effect and supply chain disruption management: New trends and research directions. 7543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1840148
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why. Project Management Journal.
Hendi Kurniawan, I. A. A. A. (2020). Analisis risiko rantai pasok material terhadap keterlambatan pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi. 14(1), 43–50.
Hinze, J. (2013). Construction safety. Prentice Hall.
Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Iii, B. A. B. (2009). No title (pp. 11–20).
Indonesia, R. (2017). -l.k-r.
Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak. 136(March).
J., E. S. (2019). Protectionism, trade wars, and international trade governance. Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research (SIAW).
Juran, J. M. (2010). Juran's quality handbook.
Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Q2l6EAAAQBAJ
Konstruksi, I., & Indicators, C. (2026). Indikator konstruksi. 20(1).
Kumar, V., et al. (2023). Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: Project practitioners' perspectives. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0001
Larasati, M., & B. B. A. (2025). The SWOT analysis as a framework for enhancing marketing strategies to drive sales growth. JURISMA: Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, 15(April), 1–11.
Levitt, H. M., et al. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force report. 73(1), 26–46.
Mitra, J., & Sipil, T. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kontraktor utama konstruksi. 1(2), 111–121.
Muanley, Y. Y., et al. (2022). Analisis sensitivitas dalam metode analytic hierarchy process dan pengaruhnya terhadap urutan prioritas pada pemilihan smartphone Android. 4(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.35580/variansiunm32
Nyaribo, J., & Muturi, W. (2017). Factors affecting procurement performance in public institutions in Kenya: A survey of public institutions in Kisii County. 19(4), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-190402121133
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
Pradipta, D., et al. (2024). Analisis jaringan rantai pasok (supply chain) kopi robusta. 3(2), 181–189.
Safitri, Z., et al. (2024). Analisis SWOT terhadap pengembangan strategi bisnis pada Warung Makan Asyik Desa Balunijuk. 2(3).
Suherman, A., & Cahyana, B. J. (2019). Pengendalian kualitas dengan metode failure mode effect and analysis (FMEA) dan pendekatan kaizen untuk mengurangi jumlah kecacatan dan penyebabnya. 1–9.
Suwarsa, T. (2021). Pengaruh pajak restoran dan pajak hotel terhadap pendapatan asli daerah Kota Padangsidempuan periode 2018–2020. Jurnal Akuntansi, 51(1), 1–15.
Syahputri, A. Z., Fallenia, F. D., & Syafitri, R. (2023). Kerangka berfikir penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 160–166.
Wieland, A., & Durach, C. F. (2021). Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271
Wiwik Handayani, M. A. Y. (2022). Analisis dan mitigasi risiko rantai pasok dengan metode AHP dan FMEA. 11, 43–53.
Zhu, Q., Xi, J., & H.-Y. C. (2024). Stakeholder mapping and analysis of off-site construction projects: Utilizing a power–interest matrix and the fuzzy.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Ainun Najib, Bambang Endro Yuwono, Fahmy Hermawan, Ade Okvianti Irlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
